Unofficial File parts/u9367c01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Electric Spike Prime Large Motor Body Assembly
0 Name: u9367c01.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 1355 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Electric Spike Prime Large Motor Front Top
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Download: parts/u9367.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Electric Spike Prime Large Motor
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSN)
Download: parts/54675.dat
Electric Spike Prime Large Motor with Coiled Cable
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSN)
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Jan 16 21:52:40 2018 part 'parts/u9367c01.dat' was renamed to 'parts/t1010c01.dat'.
At Fri May 3 12:25:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
At Sun May 12 21:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon May 27 16:20:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Corrected some details after seeing the real thing. Changed marking color to dark grey, color more faithful to the laser-printed marking.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu May 30 15:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon Dec 16 21:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- I think this should be numbered 54675c01.dat (no need to use an u... number here)
- I think a leading ~ is missing in the title (see https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/54675.dat )

At Mon Dec 16 21:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
error on my side. the number I suggested is for the full motor assembly.
but this one is only a _portion_ of that.
so using that number would be wrong.
I now understood better the numbering structure you used here.
the current part number is OK.

I am just wondering if the leading "~" in the title is missing.

At Tue Dec 17 07:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, the missing ~ is intended to allow building motor assemblies with rotated output hub.

At Sun Dec 29 22:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.