Unofficial File parts/u9253.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Cardboard  6 x  6 Thick with Sharp Corners
0 Name: u9253.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Sheet Cardboard
0 !KEYWORDS Scala, set 4336

Status:
Certified! (ACCCN)
Size: 317 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Dec 31 03:25:01 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
At Thu Jan 3 12:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Jan 5 17:50:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Was it really tan coloured from the very beginning or is it just yellowed within the last 29 years?

At Sun Jan 6 07:12:25 2019 part 'parts/u9252b.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u9253.dat'.
At Fri Jan 25 13:45:01 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Tue May 28 03:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as this is the unpatterned part, I used tan for mimicking the cardboard color.

as it is only used in the !CMDLINE default suggestion color,
I think this is not worth a hold vote

At Mon Aug 5 18:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Removed hold. But I'm not sure, if tan is correct as cmdline parameter.

At Mon Sep 2 04:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
Comments:
I agree with martin. According to:

https://www.toysperiod.com/lego-set-reference/scala/jewelry/lego-4336-mirror/

this was white and CMD line should be removed by admin.

At Mon Sep 2 06:30:01 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Mon Sep 2 06:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
CMDLINE removed. But more importantly this reference (and BrickLink) has 'part' numbers for these items (191764-191767). Such numbers are in the range used for 'paper' items, but is there any reason they could not be used instead of uXXXX number?

At Sat Nov 23 17:40:54 2019 part 'parts/u9253.dat' was renamed to 'parts/191766.dat'.
At Tue Jul 7 13:40:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
- removed CMDLINE
- simplified title

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Jul 7 15:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is it correct that this file contain a single box-prim?
Shouldn't the top surface be white, and the backside uncoloured?

At Wed Jul 8 00:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
No. This file implements the unpatterend version of this part.
The patterned ones are already official as
u9252p01.dat
u9253p01.dat

At Wed Jul 8 00:15:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
To clear up the confusion here, we are talking about 6 relevant part files here:

- (1) with sharp corners, unpatterned
- (2) with sharp corners, with 2 dogs photo
- (3) with sharp corners, with 1 cat photo
- (4) with sharp corners, with white top

- (5) with rounded corners, unpatterned
- (6) with rounded corners, with silver top

Currently these are present in our library as follows:
- (4) and (6) are official as u9252p01.dat, u9253p01.dat
- the rest is currently on the PT as 191764.dat, 191765.dat, 191766.dat, 191767.dat

We can renumber if you spot numbering error of course.

At Wed Jul 8 16:45:14 2020 part 'parts/191766.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u9253.dat'.
At Wed Jul 8 19:05:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
part numbers are OK now

At Wed Jul 8 20:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Thu Jul 9 05:30:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Thu Jul 9 05:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.