Unofficial File parts/s/4288-15.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Wheel 13 x 20 Solid Rubber with Axle Hole Tread Section
0 Name: s\4288-15.dat
0 Author: John Van Zwieten [jvan]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 1998-10-15 [PTadmin] Official Update 1998-09
0 !HISTORY 2007-09-05 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-10-20 [Steffen] BFCed, added Needs Work
0 !HISTORY 2013-10-25 [Philo] Reworked to remove gaps, improved shape

Status:
Needs admin review. (CCCF)
Size: 4630 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Wheel 13 x 20 Solid Rubber with Axle Hole
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCCSF)
Download: parts/4288.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Oct 23 09:50:06 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
At Fri Oct 25 12:20:06 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
At Sun Oct 27 16:15:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Oct 27 16:45:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
This quad:
4 4 24.1374 6.1671 1.25 25 0 1.25 24.975 1.0905 -1.25 24.3531 5.2509 -1.25
should be splitted into two triangles, because it's not planar.

At Sun Oct 27 17:45:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Hmm. DATHeader do not claim for that. Maybe it is not really planar, but in the range we accept for normal?

At Sun Oct 27 18:50:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes hat could be. I found this while checking this part visually. ;-)

At Mon Oct 28 07:55:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
The quad was below the 3 degrees limit, but splitting it slightly improves condline display (see comments on main part)

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Oct 28 16:50:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
The same problem is also visible on this quad:
4 4 25 0 1.25 24.1374 6.1671 1.25 21.79 5.6 9.25 22.5 0 9.25
It too could benefit from a split.
At Tue Oct 29 10:00:07 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not sure this brings a big improvement...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Oct 29 11:40:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
One of these condlines are not needed:
5 4 25 0 1.25 24.975 1.0905 -1.25 24.1374 6.1671 1.25 24.3834 -5.1084 -1.25
5 4 24.3531 5.2509 -1.25 24.1374 6.1671 1.25 25 0 1.25 22.3733 11.1549 -1.25
And the control points should be rework for the remaining condline.

At Tue Oct 29 13:55:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
"One of these condlines are not needed: "
No because of symmetry used in assembly, both are needed. But indeed one of them had wrong CPs after triangle split.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Oct 29 21:40:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Your split created a concave area and the benefit is indeed questionable.
A convex surface would be better.
At Wed Oct 30 08:20:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Ah - indeed! A good opportunity to test IRL my new "Flipper" tool ;)
BTW - interested beta-testers, raise hand!

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Wed Oct 30 12:00:09 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: certify
Comments:
Hm, I should start making more interfaces to LDForge so I can catch up before there's enough philotools to completely overwhelm me. :]

At Sat Nov 2 11:20:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
My hand is up.
But I guess I'll have to do it without LetGui.

At Sat Nov 2 19:10:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
For now yes, but I guess Mike will update soon...
I'll send you the files Monday!

At Sat Nov 2 19:50:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I forgot about that :(.
Start working now.

At Sat Dec 29 20:00:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Magnus was right... improved shape.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Dec 31 04:15:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Mon Dec 31 08:20:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jan 2 16:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.