Unofficial File parts/s/3818s03.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Minifig Arm Right Outer Surface Upper Arm
0 Name: s\3818s03.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // shoulder

Status:
Needs more votes. (CN)
Size: 5768 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Philo=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
~Minifig Arm Right Outer Surface
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSF)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Apr 21 09:35:00 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
To be used in printed arms.

At Tue Jun 4 08:50:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Any difference with 3818p01s05.dat / 3818p01s06.dat?

At Tue Nov 5 21:55:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Here's an image to explain the different arm subfiles.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/MagFors/LDraw/pictures/3818p01_subfiles.png

s03 and s04 are divided in the elbow line, and the p01s03-p01s06 are divided in the sleeve line.

At Wed Nov 6 08:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I start to wonder about the use cyli/cyls primitives within the arm parts: when they are rendered with primitive substitution, this result in gaps in the arms, very noticeable. Maybe we should inline them...

At Wed Nov 6 16:25:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, I was looking at them yesterday. Don't like them.

And maybe we could also remove that kink inside the elbow? It looks like it has been "forced" to fit the primitives.
I was planing to use your knob in all minifig arm parts. Maybe it is time for a reshape, before we start making patterned arms. Gerald, any opinion?

At Wed Nov 6 16:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"And maybe we could also remove that kink inside the elbow?" Yes!

At Wed Nov 6 23:35:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I must agree with Philo, due to the primitive substitution visible gaps appear when rendering the arms., Inlining some of the prims would for sure benefit the final result

What do you mean with that: that kink inside the elbow

At Thu Nov 7 12:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
See the kink on left image: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/misc2/3818.png
I'd prefer to see the surfaces spared from the kink into a smoother outer elbow surface

At Thu Nov 7 16:55:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have moved a copy of this to the forum.
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23740-post-34496.html#pid34496

At Tue Nov 26 16:55:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
s01 and s02 are official and sent to Admin.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Nov 26 18:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.