Unofficial File parts/986.dat
part image
File Header:
0 ~Technic Axle Joiner  3 x  2 with Spring - Housing Bottom
0 Name: 986.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2012-03-30 [PTadmin] Official Update 2012-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-06-16 [arezey] Added surface/axlehole details, moved screw hole locations, retitled
0 !HISTORY 2013-09-02 [MagFors] Rectified, boxified, removed some t-junctions

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSF)
Size: 15789 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
Steffen=novote
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
Technic Axle Joiner 3 x 2 with Spring
Status: 4 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSSSF)
Download: parts/44852.dat
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Jun 17 13:00:06 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
At Mon Jun 17 13:15:09 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Contains several t-junctions and the notch, where the spring is visible in the real part, could be done by a box-prim.

At Mon Jun 17 20:40:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
There's an inverse triangle in one corner, behind the axlehole at +x +z.
At Mon Jun 17 20:55:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I declare this file to be open for improvements for everybody as the current version works for me.

At Mon Sep 2 20:40:06 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Rectified, boxified, removed some t-junctions, reduced filesize by using new primitives.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Dec 26 01:55:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
retitled

At Thu Dec 26 21:30:08 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Do we not have the real part number?! Or is this the real number?

At Fri Dec 27 00:55:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
it is a placeholder one dating from times where we had no u......dat numbers
for that purpose, but has been out official already, so can be kept

At Fri Dec 27 08:00:08 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Dec 8 21:35:00 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now I can remember why I bought this piece a couple of years ago... I'll try to look inside for the part numbers in the next days.

At Sat Dec 12 23:50:00 2015, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
There are no part numbers at all in the disassembled part.