Unofficial File parts/68013.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Cylinder Half  1 x  2 with Cutout
0 Name: 68013.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CSN)
Size: 1381 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
~Cylinder Half 1 x 2 with Cutout without Front Surface
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSN)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri May 22 20:10:01 2020, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Found a funny one here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/brickset/49921457197/in/photostream/

At Mon May 25 07:55:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can find this picture only when I browse Flickr on the PC, not in the app...

At Tue Jun 30 11:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Will probably used for patterned versions, might be usful to subpart.

At Sun Aug 2 00:25:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
why the use of the tang primitives?

At Sun Aug 2 08:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
Comments:
not the badest idea - split into main- and subfile

At Sun Aug 2 10:00:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why don't you like the tang primitives?

At Sun Aug 2 10:10:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
How much of the surface should/need to be "subfiled"?
I want to cut it, and not include the surface between the stud cutouts.

At Mon Aug 3 15:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
It's just that I would use regular quads between the 1-8cylo and the 2-4cylo primitives, though I guess now I have a better understanding of why you chose to use them

At Tue Aug 4 02:20:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Actually might you be able to use a 1-8ring3 between the 1-8cylo and the 2-4cylo primitives?

At Tue Aug 4 15:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
"How much of the surface should/need to be "subfiled"?
I want to cut it, and not include the surface between the stud cutouts."
I would subfile whole face, it will avoid more surface cuts, and pattern migh go down more, especially in middle section.
Holding for orientation, should be turned 180 degrees to match other similar parts (85941, 24593, etc). Default orientation would also show pattern!
I also see this much more as a "cylinder half" than as a "Brick 1 x 2 Half Round"...
At Tue Aug 4 16:35:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I use a lot of 1-16chrd in this file. If a print is made on a normal res surface, the subfile will adapt to a hi-res surface "that isn't there".
Maybe I should not use any cyli prim in the printed surface? And remove the 1-16chrd?

At Thu Aug 6 08:10:02 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I don't know what to do with the 1-16cylo. Maybe they should be inlined?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Aug 6 11:30:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now think about it for the third day, inlining them was my first thought ... and also the last one.

I would say - yes, do that.
I don't see another chance.

At Thu Aug 6 15:00:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Agreed, inline.

At Fri Aug 7 14:35:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Inlined front surface.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri Aug 7 17:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
Comments:
hmm ... what Phillipe commented cannot be dismissed out of hand:
As a "brick" the flat backside would be closed represented.
"Cylinder Half" might be the better term.

At Fri Aug 7 18:00:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
What about orientation/description?

At Fri Aug 7 18:00:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
(ment to carry on hold)

At Sat Aug 8 08:10:01 2020, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
The orientation is changed already.
I can see why you see it as aCylinder Half, but I see it as related to the macaroni bricks, 3063 and 85080, and the 2x2 round bricks, 3941, 6143, 14785 and 92947.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Aug 8 16:30:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
- Sorry for orientation, cache issue...
- As for naming, I can obviously see the relationship with round brick and macaroni, but this one as all structural elements of cylinder halves: bottom plate, cylinder panel above, flat top with studs and middle half hole!
- Wondering for condlines in subfile, I tend to prefer them in patternable area (useful in case of simple patterns where "local" condlines may provide a better result.
- Is it just me , or is 3d view broken?

At Sat Aug 8 16:50:02 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, the 3D view doesn't work on this part. Strange. I can view other parts.