Unofficial File parts/39611.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Plate  4 x  4 x  0.667 with Five Point Star Shape
0 Name: 39611.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCCSSN)
Size: 7505 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
UR=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Lo-Res Chord 0.375
Status: Needs admin review. (CCCN)
Download: p/8/3-8chrd.dat
Lo-Res Cylinder Open 0.375
Status: 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCCSN)
Download: p/8/3-8cylo.dat
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Jan 13 17:25:01 2019, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Not sure the description is the best. Rather odd cylinder dimensions...

At Tue Jan 22 21:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Wrong top stud.

Is it correct that it doesn't fit on top of a 2x2 stud part.
The inner diameter of the big ring is to small.

At Wed Jan 23 22:50:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: novote
Comments:
According to New Elementary the bottom ring is the same size as 64951

The 64951 in the library also intersects 4 studs on the bottom

http://www.newelementary.com/2019/01/lego-movie-review-70830-sweet-mayhem-systar.html

At Thu Jan 24 06:50:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
I overlooked the logo. Changed stud type. As for bottom, Gerald is right.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jan 24 19:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

That doesn't answer my question. Should it fit onto a 2x2 stud group?
Maybe 64951 is also wrong?

At Thu Jan 24 19:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Sorry, I missed your point. It was supposed to fit, but because of a last minute change there is a little collision. I'll correct.

At Fri Jan 25 07:25:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Adjusted bottom dimension.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Jan 31 17:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Does a "star" always have five points?
5-point, Five Point, Penatagonal

At Mon Dec 30 22:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
Comments:
..part is clean..
....a pentagonal Star is more or less the standard shape in most cases....however...i think Magnus is right ...should appear in description
At Tue Dec 31 01:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
there is 1 small edgeline missing at the bottom where the star touches the cylinder

At Tue Dec 31 16:45:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Dec 31 16:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Line was there, but wrongly placed! Corrected...

At Tue Dec 31 17:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
.. and the description?

At Tue Dec 31 17:50:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Oh yes! updated description.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Dec 31 19:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Dec 31 19:25:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Jan 11 16:50:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
The description is odd..... This doesn't look like a Plate, but I have no better suggestion.