Unofficial File parts/3069bpz4.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Tile  1 x  2 with  2 White Squares on Black Background and Gold Rectangle Pattern 
0 Name: 3069bpz4.dat
0 Author: Ulrich Röder [UR]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Set 41621, BrickHeadz, Bricklink 3069bpb658
0 !CMDLINE -c47



0 // Main
Status:
Needs admin review. (CCN)
Size: 1793 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
UR=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Feb 28 19:05:02 2019, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: UR
At Sun Mar 3 09:40:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Mar 10 08:35:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why Pearl Light Gold? Printed gold should be Metallic Gold (82).

At Sun Mar 10 15:00:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Fri May 31 05:25:02 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: UR
Comments:
corrected....Magnus...THX

At Sun Jun 9 06:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Jun 9 08:35:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
why is
0 BFC NOCLIP
being used in this file?

I do not understand the purpose

At Tue Jun 11 08:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: UR
Certification: novote
Comments:
Thanks for your review and the note ... Steffen

okay ... as an author, I act here just a little longer than a year
... because I have found no further explanations ... or even tutorials to the meta "0 BFC NOCLIP"
... I assumed that it is generally in transparent components of need .... in order to see the pattern synonymous of all perspectives in the rendered object ....

would be nice ... about having a clearly defined imagination.

At Wed Jun 12 02:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK, I understand

I think the BFC NOCLIP should be removed.
Rendering software anyway must have a solution for surfaces which get rendered on transparent parts. If for example this part shall be rendered in color 47 without any pattern, then surfaces of course can be visible from their "rear" side. That's perfectly normal.
This does not change when a pattern is added.
The software then needs to apply the same solution which it applies to unpatterned parts.
At Fri Jul 19 02:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold vote following this discussion
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23501-post-32795.html?highlight=noclip#pid32795

the NOCLIP topic needs to be revisited later in future when a better programmatic solution is available

At Sat Dec 14 14:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
I still don't like the use of NOCLIP in this file.
We normally do not do this for other patterns!
EVERY patterned part potentially can be used in transparent! Should we now put NOCLIP in all our files? No!