Unofficial File parts/30231p01.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Wing Insectoid Small with Arm Hinge Left with Circuit Pattern
0 Name: 30231p01.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSN)
Size: 2133 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
GeraldLasser=certify
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Apr 17 16:50:01 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Mon Apr 17 17:40:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Curcuit -> Circuit
Wouldn't it be better to speak of left/right, with parts oriented accordingly?

At Mon Apr 17 17:50:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'll correct the typo.

What are you suggesting? Same part(number), but different orientations, depending on the patterned surface?

At Mon Apr 17 18:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Yes, exactly, p01 and p02 with different orientations. I think it's more useful this way.

At Mon Apr 17 18:25:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I like it better the way it is now:
IMHO all patterned versions of a part should have same
orientation and placement.
The pattern placement should not have impact on that IMHO.

At Sat Apr 22 20:40:01 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I think orientation trumps pattern visabillity.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Apr 22 20:50:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"I think orientation trumps pattern visabillity."
That's why I would prefer X mirroring instead of Y mirroring!

At Sun Dec 9 21:55:01 2018, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Dec 10 08:40:02 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Jun 19 23:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
the line
0 BFC NOCLIP
should be removed IMHO.

what would be the reason to have it?

At Fri Jul 19 02:20:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold vote following this discussion
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23501-post-32795.html?highlight=noclip#pid32795

the NOCLIP topic needs to be revisited later in future when a better programmatic solution is available

At Tue Feb 18 16:55:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: hold
Comments:
This has STUD2, and the p02 part is a mirror of this one, so the studs should be removed from here as they would generate a mirrored logo.

At Wed Feb 19 16:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
The p02 file was made correct in the beginning. When we filpped the orientation, it was possible to mirror the big wing but not the smaller wing. I missed that.
I've corrected that in the p02-file.

At Wed Feb 19 21:00:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: GeraldLasser
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.