Unofficial File parts/191766.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Cardboard  6 x  6 Thick with Sharp Corners for Plate  8 x  8 with Grille
0 Name: 191766.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Sheet Cardboard
0 !KEYWORDS Scala, set 4336

Status:
Needs admin review. (CCN)
Size: 348 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=certify
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Steffen=novote
cwdee=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Dec 31 03:25:01 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
At Thu Jan 3 12:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sat Jan 5 17:50:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Was it really tan coloured from the very beginning or is it just yellowed within the last 29 years?

At Sun Jan 6 07:12:25 2019 part 'parts/u9252b.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u9253.dat'.
At Fri Jan 25 13:45:01 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Tue May 28 03:20:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
as this is the unpatterned part, I used tan for mimicking the cardboard color.

as it is only used in the !CMDLINE default suggestion color,
I think this is not worth a hold vote

At Mon Aug 5 18:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Removed hold. But I'm not sure, if tan is correct as cmdline parameter.

At Mon Sep 2 04:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: certify
Comments:
I agree with martin. According to:

https://www.toysperiod.com/lego-set-reference/scala/jewelry/lego-4336-mirror/

this was white and CMD line should be removed by admin.

At Mon Sep 2 06:30:01 2019 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
At Mon Sep 2 06:40:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
CMDLINE removed. But more importantly this reference (and BrickLink) has 'part' numbers for these items (191764-191767). Such numbers are in the range used for 'paper' items, but is there any reason they could not be used instead of uXXXX number?

At Sat Nov 23 17:40:54 2019 part 'parts/u9253.dat' was renamed to 'parts/191766.dat'.