Unofficial File parts/14395.dat
part image
File Header:
0 =Arch  1 x  5 x  4
0 Name: 14395.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part Alias
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // Alias of 2339

Status:
Needs more votes. (N)
Size: 272 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
OrionP=novote
Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Dec 15 11:05:09 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
At Fri Dec 20 15:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Sun Nov 2 16:35:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Tue Nov 25 22:15:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

At Wed Dec 3 16:05:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not sure they are true aliases: plastic thickness is lower on 14395 (according to LDD data), this may mean that studs doesn't hold as they would with 2339

At Fri Dec 12 23:50:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
retracting cert

At Fri Feb 28 19:20:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would say they are functionally the same:
https://rebrickable.com/parts/14395/brick-arch-1-x-5-x-4-continuous-bow-raised-underside-cross-supports/

At Fri Feb 28 20:45:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, Philo is right. They're not the same. Please read the section called "1x5x4" in this review:
http://www.newelementary.com/2014/03/you-raise-me-arch.html#more
The walls are thinner.

At Fri Feb 28 21:05:01 2020, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: novote
Comments:
Can't be too much thinner. The article doesn't specify and the photo I posted has no decernable difference. IDK if it's worth our time updating the part dimensions. That said, it is different so I'm fine with removing the alias character and calling this a new part.